PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]
Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: absolute general law of capitalist accumulation

just one point, since I'm busy:

CB writes >On this, I take the position that Marx actually believed that dialectics
is valid and therefore necessary as part of his conception ( not merely the
word forms to be coquetted with, despite Marx's own description). In other
words, we can't dispense with dialectics and still understand _Capital_.<

I don't reject dialectical thinking. I just don't like Hegelian jargon. I think that all of CAPITAL could be translated in relatively simple language without dropping Marx's dialectical method, mode of presentation, or understanding of the world.

jim
[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]