PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Hubbert's peak
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Hubbert's peak
- From: "Devine, James" <jdevine@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 11:34:15 -0700
- Thread-index: AcRI0C4F6jXH1h+fSdqKqO372gg9hg==
- Thread-topic: Hubbert's peak
Tom Walker wrote:
>It may be helpful to non-statisticians to point out that the bell curve
is
not a theory, a fact or a physical law. It is an observed regularity
that
occurs often when looking at large numbers of cases....<
I don't think that the validity of the bell curve is that important to
the discussion of Hubbert's peak. His basic point -- or rather, that of
his followers -- is the same as that of David Ricardo & Thomas Malthus:
long-term diminishing returns in the supplies of natural resources leads
to increasing misery and/or conflict.
Of course, as with Ricardo & Malths, that ignores such matters as
technical change (improvements in the efficiency of oil use, etc.)
------------------------
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- Thread context:
- Re: eleciton, (continued)
- quotable bush,
Dan Scanlan Wed 02 Jun 2004, 21:54 GMT
- more polls,
Devine, James Wed 02 Jun 2004, 20:54 GMT
- another charity idea for Iraq,
Stephen E Philion Wed 02 Jun 2004, 19:16 GMT
- Hubbert's peak,
Devine, James Wed 02 Jun 2004, 18:34 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]