Michael Hoover wrote:
>>> dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx 5/31/2004 2:06:42 PM >>> Gitlin is a repulsive character, but everything he says in this passage is, sadly, true:But there is no evidence that nonvoters differ from voters in any ideological way.
poli sci guy stephen earl bennett's 1990 'deconstruction' ('the uses and abuses of registration and turnout data', _ps_) of above exposed it for canard it actually is...
That's not what a bunch of public opinion pundits told me recently. Most surveys found little difference between voters & nonvoters. One "deconstruction" isn't necessarily the last word.
Doug
- Re: The new number one reason to vote Nader, (continued)
- Re: The new number one reason to vote Nader, Eugene Coyle Mon 31 May 2004, 19:09 GMT
- Re: the new number one reason to vote Nader, michael a. lebowitz Mon 31 May 2004, 17:27 GMT
- Re: the new number one reason to vote Nader, Doug Henwood Mon 31 May 2004, 18:06 GMT
- Re: the new number one reason to vote Nader, Michael Hoover Tue 01 Jun 2004, 17:36 GMT
- Re: the new number one reason to vote Nader, Doug Henwood Tue 01 Jun 2004, 17:46 GMT
- Re: the new number one reason to vote Nader, Yoshie Furuhashi Wed 02 Jun 2004, 02:57 GMT
- Re: the new number one reason to vote Nader, Michael Hoover Tue 01 Jun 2004, 17:55 GMT
- Re: the new number one reason to vote Nader, Devine, James Tue 01 Jun 2004, 18:05 GMT
- Re: the new number one reason to vote Nader, Carrol Cox Tue 01 Jun 2004, 20:04 GMT