Re: Mirowski on Nash's "brilliant insight"

[Ted Winslow <egwinslow@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Jim wrote:

> So Ted assumes that I thought it was brilliant in general rather than
> in a very specific way.

Ted had asked:

> What specifically from the summary of his ideas by Mirowski would you
> select as demonstrating brilliant insight into human motives and
> behaviour?

in response to Jim's claim that:

> Einstein's Gedanken (sp?) experiments and Nash's brilliant insight
> come from non-neurotypical thinking.
>
> I do think that Nash's equilibrium [NE] concept was brilliant.

Ted