PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: a non-Jones theory of oil prices
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: a non-Jones theory of oil prices
- From: "Devine, James" <jdevine@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 12:49:35 -0700
- Thread-index: AcQ8zJWcH4lToFd1QRaD5wdqZJAZTQARFvdk
- Thread-topic: [PEN-L] a non-Jones theory of oil prices
"Michael Perelman wrote:
> Of course, Mark Jones is ultimately correct. At some point natural conditions will
> drive up the price of hydrocarbons. The only question is about timing.
not so. What if an extremely efficient solar energy system were developed? Then (if it were not suppressed) the demand for hydrocarbons would likely fall to the floor. Or, more likely, level off.
Jim D.
- Thread context:
- Re: a non-Jones theory of oil prices, (continued)
- Re: a non-Jones theory of oil prices,
Michael Perelman Tue 18 May 2004, 02:45 GMT
- Re: a non-Jones theory of oil prices,
Julio Huato Tue 18 May 2004, 13:29 GMT
- Re: a non-Jones theory of oil prices,
Devine, James Tue 18 May 2004, 19:49 GMT
- Re: a non-Jones theory of oil prices,
Waistline2 Fri 21 May 2004, 03:06 GMT
- Re: a non-Jones theory of oil prices,
Waistline2 Sat 22 May 2004, 23:45 GMT
- More Adverts..,
sartesian Mon 17 May 2004, 22:05 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]