The two paragraphs below which open a long opinion piece would be unremarkable from the NY Times Op Ed page.
Though America has condemned the cruelties of Abu Ghraib, they remain nonetheless a symbol of the inescapable fact that the war has been run incompetently, with an apparently deliberate contempt for history, strategy, and thought, and with too little regard for the American soldier, whose mounting casualties seem to have no effect on the boastfulness of the civilian leadership.
Before the war's inception, and even after September 11, the Bush administration, having promised to correct its predecessor's depredations of the military, failed to do so. The president failed to go to Congress on September 12 to ask for a declaration of war, failed to ask Congress when he did go before it for the tools with which to fight, and has failed consistently to ask the American people for sacrifice. And yet their sons, mainly, are sacrificed in Iraq day by day.
But they are not from the NYT or a liberal source.
They were written by a regular on the Wall Street Journal editorial page, novelist MARK HELPRIN and appeared today, May 17, 2004; Page A20.
- Re: game theory, (continued)
- Re: game theory, Devine, James Fri 21 May 2004, 16:13 GMT
- Re: game theory, Ted Winslow Sat 22 May 2004, 13:37 GMT
- Re: game theory, Devine, James Sat 22 May 2004, 22:21 GMT
- Anthropology and imperialism, Louis Proyect Mon 17 May 2004, 16:40 GMT
- Winds of change, Eugene Coyle Mon 17 May 2004, 15:39 GMT
- The Simpsons on Alcatraz, Louis Proyect Mon 17 May 2004, 14:43 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: The Simpsons on Alcatraz, Carl Remick Mon 17 May 2004, 17:38 GMT
- Re: Russian health care, "Chris Doss" Mon 17 May 2004, 07:50 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Russian health care, "Chris Doss" Mon 17 May 2004, 12:11 GMT