PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Why did the USSR fall
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Why did the USSR fall
- From: "Devine, James" <jdevine@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 08:17:35 -0700
- Thread-index: AcQwQkbciIkb+vRZQ626xeB47wSuwQAFdjeg
- Thread-topic: [PEN-L] Why did the USSR fall
Chris D writes:
>Societal change in Russia has always almost always come from the top down. It has been Revolution from Above since the days of Peter the Great on through Catherine the Great, Stalin, Khrushchev, Gorbachev, Yeltsin and Putin, and thus it shall probably be until the end of time.<
I disagree. In 1917, there was a huge "from below" component, as there had been in 1905. The importance of "from above" initiatives rose after that, as the Soviet state minimized, atomized, and controlled the role of independent organizations of workers, peasants, etc. But even Gorby, Yeltsin, and Putin must have had some support from below for their from-above initiatives to have an effect.
Jim D.
- Thread context:
- Re: Why did the USSR fall, (continued)
- Re: Why did the USSR fall,
"Chris Doss" Sun 02 May 2004, 12:37 GMT
- Re: Why did the USSR fall,
Waistline2 Sat 01 May 2004, 17:28 GMT
- Re: Why did the USSR fall,
Devine, James Sun 02 May 2004, 15:21 GMT
- Re: Why did the USSR fall,
Devine, James Sun 02 May 2004, 16:22 GMT
- Subject: Re: The Jesus Factor,
Seth Sandronsky Sat 01 May 2004, 13:04 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]