PEN-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Final response: Another classroom exercise



Title: Message
 
While Zizek's behavior is reprehensible, especially given that his teaching duties are almost certainly minimal, it is not uncommon that when teachers get burned out, they start to take short cuts. These are often indirectly encouraged by the administration which cuts funding for teaching, takes on too many students for the faculty, rewards easy teachers who give high grades, etc.  Teachers start to give micky mouse tests, reduce readings, cut short their classes, take days off, etc. Avoiding students is a common enough short cut.
 
Of course, a basic problem is that tenure often enough has little to do with teaching well.  Disdain for the undergraduates is an occupational disease.
 
Michael Yates 
 
 
Response Jim C: Absolutely true. I am ever mindful that being tenured, I have some degrees of freedom in my own work--sometimes--that few people have in their own work situations. I am always mindful that abuses of tenure provoke reactions to eliminate tenure which is exactly what the right-wingers want.
 
I am also mindful at all times of the sacrifices that students are making and must make and that they are paying dearly and count on me to be ready to rock n' roll in and out of the classroom. But I am also mindful that I have x amount of physical/emotional/compassion energy that must be rationed so that some of the obvious punks, deadbeats, flakes, posturers, players and just plain preppy punks (like Bush) do not crowd out the truly deserving and/or get with the program to be among the truly deserving of extra attention and care.  
 
I know that my students (who were assigned Michael's book "Naming the System" as soon as it came out and still are) were so taken that the author of one of their texts would care enough to come and talk with them and answer their questions. I told them I only met one of the author's of one of my texts when I was in school--and he was a total asshole and pompous narcissist. Every one of my students had read Michael's book cover-to-cover within two weeks without any prompting by me and not one, I mean not one, ever asked me if the content would be on the tests or what to focus on in the book; it was truly inspiring and a testimony to the clarity, engaging writing style and content in Michael's book.
 
Those who hold these scarce and potentially influencial positions in academia must always remember that without those students, such positions--their jobs--would not exist. Beyond that, there is simply the mandate for all self-described radicals: serve those in need of help or get out of the way. 
 
Jim C.
 


Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]