Michael Perelman wrote:
Supposedly, new technology lowers prices, which spurs new demand, which reemploy as the workers. I'm not saying I accept this argument, but I have not seen many economists eating crow.
Several centuries of capitalist history are on the side of the non-crow-eaters, no? I like Ursula Huws's argument that one reason is the continued commodification of household tasks, an instance of capitalism's seemingly endless propensity to create new and profitable "needs."
Doug
- Re: Job flight, (continued)
- Re: Job flight, ravi Sun 28 Mar 2004, 23:43 GMT
- Re: Job flight, Devine, James Sun 28 Mar 2004, 17:50 GMT
- Re: Job flight, Anthony D'Costa Sun 28 Mar 2004, 19:27 GMT
- Re: Job flight, Michael Perelman Sun 28 Mar 2004, 20:44 GMT
- Re: Job flight, Doug Henwood Sun 28 Mar 2004, 21:09 GMT
- Re: Job flight, Michael Perelman Sun 28 Mar 2004, 22:27 GMT
- Re: Job flight, Doug Henwood Sun 28 Mar 2004, 22:43 GMT
- Re: Job flight, dmschanoes Sun 28 Mar 2004, 21:28 GMT
- Re: Job flight, jjlassen Sun 28 Mar 2004, 19:41 GMT