Michael,
I have read of 'cultural capital' and 'political captital' which seems
to be equivalent of that obscene capitalist construction called, I
think, 'good will' which corporations can claim as wealth when they sell
out. But that is not investment in any sense in that it does not involve
investment of (labour) resources in creating something of productive (
and productive is the operative word) value.
Human capital is something quite different. Humans invest in
buying knowledge, produced by labour, which increases their
productivity at a later date. In that sense, human capital is a form of
'dead labour' equivalent to physical capital. None of these others are
'real' investment in 'dead labour' and hence, are not capital in the
sense we use the term.Paul Phillips
Michael Perelman wrote:
112-3: They refer to "a plethora of capitals" -- human capital, cultural capital, and even self-command capital.. Baron, James N. and Michael T. Hannan. 1994. "The Impact of Economics on Contemporary Sociology." Journal of Economic Literature, 32: 3 (September): pp. 111-46.
-- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
- Re: 2008, or After Bush, (continued)
- Re: 2008, or After Bush, Carrol Cox Wed 24 Mar 2004, 15:57 GMT
- Russia raises growth forecast, "Chris Doss" Fri 26 Mar 2004, 10:46 GMT
- Gregory Wilpert on John Kerry's Attack on Venezuela, Yoshie Furuhashi Tue 23 Mar 2004, 06:01 GMT
- human capital again, Michael Perelman Tue 23 Mar 2004, 03:48 GMT
- Re: human capital again, paul phillips Tue 23 Mar 2004, 05:40 GMT
- Re: human capital again, Michael Perelman Tue 23 Mar 2004, 06:00 GMT
- Re: human capital again, paul phillips Tue 23 Mar 2004, 07:12 GMT
- Re: human capital again, soula avramidis Tue 23 Mar 2004, 09:59 GMT
- Re: human capital again, Grant Lee Tue 23 Mar 2004, 10:20 GMT