Re: [Marxism] A tactical debate

[Carrol Cox <cbcox@xxxxxxxxx>]

Doug Henwood wrote:
>
> Marvin Gandall wrote:
>
> >If that is your position, you would be saying, against all evidence and
> >logic, that there was a bipartisan consensus for the invasion of Iraq,
> >and all the past year's noise and talk of a split in the US ruling class
> >over the war was just so much malarkey.
>
> You don't understand. Parties and personnel don't matter. Whatever
> happens is because of the deep inner needs of capital. Until the
> revolution, it's just going to keep on keeping on like this. And the
> revolution will emerge from nowhere, without warning, like an
> earthquake.
>

I wish once in awhile you would offer an argument rather than engaging
in juvenile humor.

Carrol
> Doug