PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Question on public choice theory
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Question on public choice theory
- From: "Devine, James" <jdevine@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:16:13 -0800
- Thread-index: AcQGzefMkWkt90QFT7mszDyAfDLMuQADhuvQ
- Thread-topic: [PEN-L] Question on public choice theory
> Public choice theory suggests that people vote with their pocketbooks.
> How would they explain that more educated people have more liberal
> voting preferences?
as others have suggested, the word "liberal" is ambiguous. I would guess that all else constant, higher-income people are more "liberal" on "social issues" such as abortion, gay marriage, etc. But on issues that affect their incomes or the value of their homes, I'd guess that (all else constant) they are less "liberal." The latter fits with the Buchanan/Tulloch/etc. version of "public choice."
It's like the "liberal media" issue: the US media is "liberal" on feminist issues and the like, but not so on unionism, corporate globalization, etc.
Jim D.
- Thread context:
- Re: Question on public choice theory, (continued)
- Re: Question on public choice theory,
Bill Lear Wed 10 Mar 2004, 18:37 GMT
- Re: Question on public choice theory,
Marvin Gandall Wed 10 Mar 2004, 19:20 GMT
- Re: Question on public choice theory,
Calvin Ostrum Wed 10 Mar 2004, 19:45 GMT
- Re: Question on public choice theory,
Paul Wed 10 Mar 2004, 20:36 GMT
- Re: Question on public choice theory,
Devine, James Wed 10 Mar 2004, 20:16 GMT
- Software commodification,
Louis Proyect Wed 10 Mar 2004, 18:23 GMT
- America's Love Affair with the Car,
michael perelman Wed 10 Mar 2004, 17:06 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]