|
It was a more general complaint, and I felt that having published in the
magazine, contributed to it, and subscribed for 25 years, I might get a note
from the exalted editor. Previous editors were courteous enough to
respond, much as I respond to letters we get at Monthly Review.
It doesn't take long to do, and it is good PR.
Hey, maybe you could recommend my new book to Shatz. After all, I
reviewed both your (Wall Street) and your wife's (sweatshop book) books,
quite favorably. And for way below market rates! Not in the Nation
though.
Michael Yates
|
- Re: Teixeira thesis, (continued)
- Re: Teixeira thesis, Michael Hoover Sat 06 Mar 2004, 18:45 GMT
- Re: Teixeira thesis, Devine, James Sat 06 Mar 2004, 20:46 GMT
- Re: Teixeira thesis, MICHAEL YATES Sat 06 Mar 2004, 21:16 GMT
- Re: Teixeira thesis, Doug Henwood Sat 06 Mar 2004, 21:29 GMT
- Re: Teixeira thesis, MICHAEL YATES Sat 06 Mar 2004, 21:41 GMT
- Chalabi and Sistani, Marvin Gandall Sat 06 Mar 2004, 16:08 GMT
- Facing South, Michael Hoover Sat 06 Mar 2004, 12:27 GMT
- liars at work, Dan Scanlan Fri 05 Mar 2004, 23:20 GMT
- An injury to one is an injury to all...., Mike Ballard Fri 05 Mar 2004, 22:16 GMT