PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: The Teixeira thesis
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: The Teixeira thesis
- From: "Devine, James" <jdevine@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 12:51:05 -0800
- Thread-index: AcQC6nE0YCK5TWXRQOCiX8zPU+9xBgACP0FA
- Thread-topic: [PEN-L] The Teixeira thesis
Erik Ohlin Wright did some work where he was able to define different "positions in the class structure" and assign specific percentages to each.
------------------------
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Max B. Sawicky [mailto:sawicky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 11:45 AM
> To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PEN-L] The Teixeira thesis
>
>
> Oh. They like to define things with numbers.
>
> mbs
>
>
> Subject: Re: The Teixeira thesis
>
>
> To the people who didn't like your definition, of course.
> Max B. Sawicky wrote:
>
> >Acceptable to whom?
> >
> >Max B. Sawicky wrote:
> >
> >>In a meeting at EPI I said you could define
> >>the working class as those who must work to finance a standard
> >>of living, and somebody said that was a marxist definition.
>
- Thread context:
- Re: The Teixeira thesis, (continued)
- Re: The Teixeira thesis,
Devine, James Fri 05 Mar 2004, 17:14 GMT
- Re: The Teixeira thesis,
Devine, James Fri 05 Mar 2004, 17:22 GMT
- Re: The Teixeira thesis,
Devine, James Fri 05 Mar 2004, 20:51 GMT
- Re: The Teixeira thesis,
Michael Hoover Fri 05 Mar 2004, 21:36 GMT
- Re: The Teixeira thesis,
Michael Hoover Fri 05 Mar 2004, 21:45 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]