Re: communicating on pen-l

[dmschanoes <dmschanoes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Just to set the record straight:  Excuse me,   Louis challenged ME directly.
Remember?  I posted first the piece about oil prices as an index to the
direction of capital. Lou took exception to my dismissal of scarcity.

I responded.
Lou responded.
I re-responded.
Lou re-re-responded
etc.

If the issue has critical impact to economic analysis, and practical
opposition, then why would anyone oppose continued exploration?

dms

Last for the day.  All further responses off-list.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Perelman" <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 11:02 AM
Subject: [PEN-L] communicating on pen-l


> David challenged Lou and Lou responded regarding oil.  First of all,
please do not
> challenge people directly on the list.  That way, we can avoid flaming
[flaring] and
> people don't find the need to go on and on with interminable challenge and
response
> threads.
>
> Also, David made his case already.  Merely heaping on more of the same
adds little to
> the discussion.
>  --
> Michael Perelman
> Economics Department
> California State University
> Chico, CA 95929
>
> Tel. 530-898-5321
> E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
>