PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: a public plea to pen-l list members
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: a public plea to pen-l list members
- From: "Devine, James" <jdevine@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 08:14:22 -0800
- Thread-index: AcP/n/a3X3dFMCpUSkq2zF7w1S2nygAB4CDg
- Thread-topic: [PEN-L] a public plea to pen-l list members
In addition, pen-lers should make a major change to the _content_ of their missives when replying to others. Instead of simply replying to Renegade X or Apostate Y in kind, we should write with the _list as a whole_ as our audience, trying to convince the group of the validity of our viewpoints. So instead of saying "you douche-bag and intellectual war criminal, any child would know that Frobenius solved that problem many years ago," say "in light of the Frobenius theorem, the results are different than what X says." I know this is academic, but it avoids personal animosity from getting mixed up with honest disagreements.
------------------------
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]