Carrol Cox wrote:
Michael Hoover wrote:
dem power brokers would prefer losing with kerry to winning with dean...
They have always preferred to lose with [whoever] rather than win with anyone who might conceivably (even unintentionally) give encouragement to anythink like a social movement. Dean was quite trustworthy to maintain a conservative policy, but his followers had to be discouraged.
Aren't you the one always going on about reckless generalizations about other people's motivations and states of mind? How do you know this?
Doug
- Re: Michael Moore, (continued)
- Re: Michael Moore, Dan Scanlan Wed 11 Feb 2004, 19:20 GMT
- Re: Michael Moore, Louis Proyect Wed 11 Feb 2004, 19:38 GMT
- Re: Michael Moore, Michael Hoover Wed 11 Feb 2004, 19:58 GMT
- Re: Michael Moore, Carrol Cox Wed 11 Feb 2004, 21:23 GMT
- Re: Michael Moore, Doug Henwood Wed 11 Feb 2004, 22:51 GMT
- Better Lose With Kerry Than Win With Dean?, andie nachgeborenen Wed 11 Feb 2004, 22:41 GMT
- FW: ATKINS DIET SHOCKER, Devine, James Wed 11 Feb 2004, 17:04 GMT
- Iraqi bank to prepare for privatisation, k hanly Wed 11 Feb 2004, 17:04 GMT
- Dow Chemical's Knowledge Factories, Brian McKenna Wed 11 Feb 2004, 16:40 GMT