Marvin Gandall wrote:
This is true, but I think the classical socialist movement favoured concentration for mostly economic rather than political reasons -- ie., like bourgeois economics, Marxists and social democrats saw concentration as "historically progressive" because it yielded economies of scale, and large-scale enterprises could more easily be brought under public ownership without the need for much prior industrial reorganization in the affected sector.
I don't have the exact quote in front of me, but at the end of his book on J.P. Morgan, Vincent Carasso quoted a unnamed socialist who said on the occasion of Old Livernose's death that unlike many populists, socialists didn't object to Morgan because he proved in practice what they hold in theory, that competition isn't necessary for the organization of economic life.
Doug
- Re: The economy - a new era?, (continued)
- Re: The economy - a new era?, Doug Henwood Wed 11 Feb 2004, 17:21 GMT
- Re: The economy - a new era?, joanna bujes Wed 11 Feb 2004, 17:46 GMT
- Re: The economy - a new era?, Michael Perelman Wed 11 Feb 2004, 17:48 GMT
- Re: The economy - a new era?, Marvin Gandall Wed 11 Feb 2004, 18:58 GMT
- Re: The economy - a new era?, Doug Henwood Wed 11 Feb 2004, 21:23 GMT
- Re: The economy - a new era?, Michael Perelman Thu 12 Feb 2004, 16:50 GMT
- Re: The economy - a new era?, Eubulides Thu 12 Feb 2004, 17:20 GMT
- Re: The economy - a new era?, paul phillips Wed 11 Feb 2004, 22:22 GMT
- Re: The economy - a new era?, Louis Proyect Wed 11 Feb 2004, 23:28 GMT