On Monday, February 9, 2004 at 10:28:36 (-0500) Doug Henwood writes:...
Or, if you want to take it further, there's Judith Butler's argument
- rooted in that silly doctrine called psychoanalysis - that subjects
are formed in subjection (through deference to authority figures,
like parents, and their successors, like language and law), and that
attitude of deference to authority persists through life, for fear of
the disintegration of the subject.
So, our chains become part of us, and attempts to break the chains
therefore hurt?
Bill
- Re: Psychoanalysis Re: "happiness is a transitory state", (continued)
- Re: Psychoanalysis Re: "happiness is a transitory state", Bill Lear Mon 09 Feb 2004, 15:44 GMT
- Re: Psychoanalysis Re: "happiness is a transitory state", Doug Henwood Mon 09 Feb 2004, 16:33 GMT
- Re: Psychoanalysis Re: "happiness is a transitory state", Yoshie Furuhashi Tue 10 Feb 2004, 16:35 GMT
- Re: Psychoanalysis Re: "happiness is a transitory state", Michael Perelman Tue 10 Feb 2004, 17:20 GMT
- Re: Psychoanalysis Re: "happiness is a transitory state", Joel Blau Mon 09 Feb 2004, 17:15 GMT
- Re: Psychoanalysis Re: "happiness is a transitory state", Mike Ballard Tue 10 Feb 2004, 16:35 GMT
- Re: Psychoanalysis Re: "happiness is a transitory state", Louis Proyect Tue 10 Feb 2004, 16:48 GMT
- Re: Psychoanalysis Re: "happiness is a transitory state", Mike Ballard Wed 11 Feb 2004, 07:16 GMT
- Re: Psychoanalysis Re: "happiness is a transitory state", Eugene Coyle Mon 09 Feb 2004, 18:13 GMT