|
Michael L. wrote
--right, that's the one.
On the
other hand, there must be currents within currents in China. Eg., the paper I
gave at the Beijing Conference talked about how commodity exchange (while not to
be identified with capitalism) creates conditions for the restoration of
capitalism because of the nature of people produced under these relations and
that only the conscious creation of new social relations, the invading communist
society from below, could check this.(I didn't mention China but it was clear
what I was talking about.)
--you could
have directly mentioned China, would have probably been a good idea, to
open up debate.
I learned
recently that the paper was translated and published in September in the first
issue of a new journal, the journal of the Shanghai School of Economics.
Somebody must want to discuss these questions.
--there surely are, they're in the minority, but
they do exist.
steve |
- Eco-imperialism?, Louis Proyect Fri 30 Jan 2004, 16:39 GMT
- How to Defeat the US Military with your Underpants, Brian McKenna Fri 30 Jan 2004, 16:39 GMT
- Re: How to Defeat the US Military with your Underpants, Louis Proyect Fri 30 Jan 2004, 16:59 GMT
- Separated at birth, Louis Proyect Fri 30 Jan 2004, 15:11 GMT
- re China's new Marxist left?, Stephen Philion Fri 30 Jan 2004, 04:27 GMT
- new frontiers of profit......, Eubulides Fri 30 Jan 2004, 03:49 GMT
- Re: new frontiers of profit......, Michael Perelman Fri 30 Jan 2004, 05:04 GMT
- Re: new frontiers of profit......, Eubulides Fri 30 Jan 2004, 05:07 GMT
- Re: new frontiers of profit......, Dan Scanlan Fri 30 Jan 2004, 19:41 GMT