Re: Texas redistricting & fairness

[Eugene Coyle <eugenecoyle@xxxxxxx>]

That was Phil Burton, wasn't it?

Gene

Michael Perelman wrote:

In all fairness, John Burton did one of the first modern redistricting in
California.  What is new here is that the Repugs. want to do it whenever
they can rather than wait for the next census.


On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 02:32:30PM -0600, Bill Lear wrote:
  

On Friday, December 12, 2003 at 14:33:22 (-0500) Michael Hoover writes:
    

mpollak@xxxxxxxxx 12/12/03 10:14AM >>>
            

>From today's Washington Post:
Judge Patrick Higginbotham, of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th
Circuit and one of three federal judges hearing the case, seemed
skeptical
of the Democrats' suggestion that redistricting had ever been a
scrupulously fair undertaking. ...
...
surprise, surprise, courts (or 2 major parties for that matter) have
adequately addressed integrity of competitive electoral process as
constitutional matter...so-called good-clean gov't/fair election types
correlate competitive and meaningful which, i suppose, has some
validity...of course, choices in competitive contest may/may not
themselves be meaningful...
      

I'm surprised that on a progressive econ list such as this, the
motives of the gerrymanderers (er?) to escape competition have not
been compared to those who undertake corporate gerrymandering of
markets to avoid dread "ruinous competition" and how thereby a large
percentage of our so-called market economy is anything but.


Bill
    

--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx