PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Productive/Unproductive Labour
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Productive/Unproductive Labour
- From: "Devine, James" <jdevine@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 20:15:35 -0800
- Thread-index: AcO+snlgPAqkUHkvTO25DQd9yB1Y1AAIURHa
- Thread-topic: [PEN-L] Productive/Unproductive Labour
Marx wasn't very clear about his purposes in CAPITAL (and the THEORIES OF SURPLUS VALUE), beyond the general purpose of limning the laws of motion of the capitalist mode of production. I don't know what his purpose in developing the concepts of (un)productive labor was. To some extent, he was simply responding to Ricardo's and Smith's concepts: he was developing a "law of value" in response to their labor theories of value and since they -- and other classical economists -- talked about (un)productive labor, he had to do so too, within the context of his "law of value."
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Carrol Cox [mailto:cbcox@xxxxxxxxx]
I wonder if everyone (on both sides) responding to this topic (not only
in this thread, but in published works on the topic) is not assuming
that Marx in his stumblings around this issue was trying to answer the
same questions that "economists" try to answer.
- Thread context:
- Comprehensive Revision of NIPA,
Paul Wed 10 Dec 2003, 14:18 GMT
- Thurs. Dec. 11: Doug Henwood & Robert Pollin at Brecht Forum,
Ruth Indeck Wed 10 Dec 2003, 13:17 GMT
- cafta,
Eubulides Wed 10 Dec 2003, 05:25 GMT
- Fw: [PEN-L] John Kenneth Galbraith,
Michael Dawson Wed 10 Dec 2003, 04:49 GMT
- Re: Productive/Unproductive Labour,
Devine, James Wed 10 Dec 2003, 04:15 GMT
- WTO, still stumbling,
Eubulides Wed 10 Dec 2003, 03:09 GMT
- the corporatization of war redux,
Eubulides Wed 10 Dec 2003, 02:56 GMT
- Interview with John Kenneth Galbraith,
Bill Lear Wed 10 Dec 2003, 00:29 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]