Paul wrote:
The two eras differ not just "just" the contrast in fairness (a big enough issue) but the contrast in terms of actual increases in the productivity of capital. Wolff shows the Reagan-Clinton era as not just treating the average person badly, but for no real *sustainable* gain in the underlying "engine" of growth.
For what it's worth, the official BLS stats for the output per unit of capital (from the multifactor productivity series), average annual growth rate by period, for all nonfarm business and manufacturing alone:
all
nonfarm
biz mfg1950-73 +0.1% -0.3% 1973-94 -1.0% -0.9% 1994-2000/1 -1.2% +0.2%
- Thanks Michael, Doyle Saylor Mon 08 Dec 2003, 01:20 GMT
- Re: Zionists & American Blacks, Jurriaan Bendien Mon 08 Dec 2003, 00:32 GMT
- Re: Estimating the surplus\Doug's question, Jurriaan Bendien Mon 08 Dec 2003, 00:21 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Estimating the surplus\Doug's question, Paul Tue 09 Dec 2003, 14:08 GMT
- Re: Estimating the surplus\Doug's question, Doug Henwood Tue 09 Dec 2003, 22:33 GMT
- Productive/Unproductive Labour, paul phillips Tue 09 Dec 2003, 23:27 GMT
- Re: Productive/Unproductive Labour, Carrol Cox Wed 10 Dec 2003, 00:13 GMT
- Re: Productive/Unproductive Labour, paul phillips Wed 10 Dec 2003, 03:34 GMT
- Re: Productive/Unproductive Labour, Carrol Cox Wed 10 Dec 2003, 04:21 GMT