Re: Question for Louis Proyect

[Michael Perelman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Michael, drop it!

On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 03:34:01PM -0800, Michael Dawson wrote:
> I did not call you an FBI agent on LBO-talk, though I did say you have penis
> envy regarding Doug Henwood.  Meanwhile, I assume you're too embarrassed by
> your own argument that "urban life is unsustainable" to answer my question.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Louis Proyect" <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 12:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [PEN-L] Question for Louis Proyect
>
>
> > You have some fucking nerve interrogating me. You wrote me that I was
> > probably an FBI agent and accused me of "penis envy" on LBO-Talk because I
> > wrote a critique of Henwood's Nation Magazine article. If I ever get out
> to
> > Portland to look up some old friends, I might drop into see you and let
> you
> > say those things to my face, you jive-ass punk. If Perelman wants to unsub
> > me for a month or two, go ahead. I wanted to get this off my chest...
> >
> > At 12:25 PM 11/30/2003 -0800, you wrote:
> > >Dear Mr. Proyect:  In what sense do you mean your claim that "urban life
> > >is unsustainable?"  Do you mean we need better cities, or that cities
> > >themselves have to go?  Please clarify.  Your 11/27 posting appears to
> > >argue against the continued existence of urban living of any kind.  True
> > >or false?
> >
> > Louis Proyect, Marxism mailing list: http://www.marxmail.org
> >

--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx