Re: Question for Louis Proyect

[Michael Perelman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I have no idea what brought this on, but it is not acceptable here.  Lou
knows that.  I have no idea about penis envy, but whatever goes on on
other lists need not concern us here.


On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 03:53:47PM -0500, Louis Proyect wrote:
> You have some fucking nerve interrogating me. You wrote me that I was
> probably an FBI agent and accused me of "penis envy" on LBO-Talk because I
> wrote a critique of Henwood's Nation Magazine article. If I ever get out to
> Portland to look up some old friends, I might drop into see you and let you
> say those things to my face, you jive-ass punk. If Perelman wants to unsub
> me for a month or two, go ahead. I wanted to get this off my chest...
>
> At 12:25 PM 11/30/2003 -0800, you wrote:
> >Dear Mr. Proyect:  In what sense do you mean your claim that "urban life
> >is unsustainable?"  Do you mean we need better cities, or that cities
> >themselves have to go?  Please clarify.  Your 11/27 posting appears to
> >argue against the continued existence of urban living of any kind.  True
> >or false?
>
> Louis Proyect, Marxism mailing list: http://www.marxmail.org

--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx