Re: Winners and losers

[Eubulides <paraconsistent@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Yoshie Furuhashi" <furuhashi.1@xxxxxxx>

> The so-called anti-globalization movement is a mixed bag.  The
> hegemonic bloc in the movement, I think, are social democratic
> political parties and NGOs funded by liberal foundations like the
> Ford Foundation, rather than anarchists and autonomists.  Anarchist
> and autonomist intellectuals, if anything, mainly serve to entertain,
> by what sounds like a novel revolutionary rhetoric, youths in the
> movement who might, otherwise, get impatient with the politics of
> serial protests and develop a political ambition.
> --
> Yoshie


===================


Operation infinite arrogance, from Mt. Olympus, Ohio, continues.

What evidence, if any, do you have that anarchist and autonomists are the
Jerry Springer's of 21st century NSM's? And what evidence do you have that
young people study them without the level of seriousness that, say, Anne
Pomeroy studies Alfred North Whitehead?

And, of course, you have no political ambitions whatsoever. You're a real
metapolitical revolutionary; pure as the driven snow. If only every other
activist was a clone of you.

Ian