|
In a message dated 11/28/03 3:36:36 PM Pacific Standard Time, lnp3@xxxxxxxxx writes:
Melvin wrote: Reply
Actually, the bulk of the substance of what was written is about a society without a mode of production. Primitive man under more than less nature conditions. There are no homosexuals in this society, only people who have sex. Who these people sex with is no ones business and has not acquired a social meaning as such. Reproduction has not yet been ritualized and the division of labor has not yet assumed form.
Melvin P
|
- Re: Malthus/Thanksgiving, (continued)
- Re: Malthus/Thanksgiving, Waistline2 Fri 28 Nov 2003, 23:17 GMT
- Re: Malthus/Thanksgiving, Louis Proyect Fri 28 Nov 2003, 23:36 GMT
- Re: Malthus/Thanksgiving, Michael Perelman Fri 28 Nov 2003, 23:38 GMT
- Re: Malthus/Thanksgiving, Jurriaan Bendien Sat 29 Nov 2003, 00:02 GMT
- Re: Malthus/Thanksgiving, Waistline2 Sat 29 Nov 2003, 01:07 GMT
- Re: Malthus/Thanksgiving, Waistline2 Sat 29 Nov 2003, 01:08 GMT
- Re: Too many humans?/sex, reproduction, sexuality and everything/draft, Waistline2 Thu 27 Nov 2003, 20:10 GMT
- Bush to Lady Liberty: Starve, Michael Pollak Thu 27 Nov 2003, 19:39 GMT
- Re: Bush to Lady Liberty: Starve, Jurriaan Bendien Thu 27 Nov 2003, 20:54 GMT