Re: value and gender

To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: value and gender
From: g kohler <gko15@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:00:09 -0500

Mike B wrote:

"Aren't wages determined by. . .  what a worker can get for
their skills on the market?"

My example assumed that the skills of women and men were the same and that
the wages were different due to discrimination.
GK

_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

Follow-Ups:
- Re: value and gender
  - From: Mike Ballard

Prev by Date: Re: the Clinton years
Next by Date: Re: value and gender
Previous by thread: Re: value and gender
Next by thread: Re: value and gender
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Unemployment Redefined, Jing Zhao Mon 17 Nov 2003, 07:20 GMT
- value and gender, g kohler Mon 17 Nov 2003, 03:58 GMT
  - Re: value and gender, Mike Ballard Mon 17 Nov 2003, 04:50 GMT
  - Re: value and gender, Jurriaan Bendien Mon 17 Nov 2003, 08:16 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: value and gender, g kohler Mon 17 Nov 2003, 17:00 GMT
    - Re: value and gender, Mike Ballard Tue 18 Nov 2003, 02:59 GMT
      
      Re: value and gender, Renato Pompeu Tue 18 Nov 2003, 05:00 GMT
  - Re: value and gender, g kohler Mon 17 Nov 2003, 17:13 GMT
    - Re: value and gender, Jurriaan Bendien Mon 17 Nov 2003, 20:13 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]