PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Joan Robinson question
I doubt that she would read Commons. I am guessing that the capital
controversy is the CC controversy.
She traces the controversy to Wicksell, and even more directly to Sraffa,
who I doubt read Commons.
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 08:15:26PM -0800, Eubulides wrote:
> Does anyone on the list know if JR read John Commons "Legal Foundations of
> Capitalism"? I'm re-reading Morton Horwitz' ""The Transformation of
> American Law: 1870-1960" and seeing intimations of the CC controversy in
> US court cases from the 20's and am wondering if I'm
> hallucinating............
>
> Juriaan, I'll try to reply to your "new rules" post tomorrow.
>
>
>
>
> ====================================
> To this day, no one has come up with a set of rules for
> originality. There aren't any. [Les Paul]
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread context:
- Re: New rules - reply to Ian, (continued)
- Microsoft and the future of anti-trust,
Eubulides Sun 02 Nov 2003, 04:19 GMT
- Joan Robinson question,
Eubulides Sun 02 Nov 2003, 04:13 GMT
- That ain't workin', that's the way to do it,
Jurriaan Bendien Sun 02 Nov 2003, 03:57 GMT
- Iraqi businessmen complain about American primitive accumulation,
Jurriaan Bendien Sun 02 Nov 2003, 02:07 GMT
- The plan for primitive accumulation in Iraq: Greg Palast reveals all,
Jurriaan Bendien Sun 02 Nov 2003, 01:57 GMT
- New rules for the primitive accumulation of capital,
Jurriaan Bendien Sun 02 Nov 2003, 01:37 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]