Re: In defence of Krugman

[Kenneth Campbell <kkc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Wellllll... yes and no.

Yes, it was "Warren's" court, and Eisenhower was disappointed with his
two appointments.

But,  no, Warren couldn't have done anything without Black and Douglas.
And Douglas was a major source of this extreme free speech-ism. (Mind
you, I wasn't there.)

Ken.

--
I used to work in a fire hydrant factory. You couldn't park
anywhere near the place.
          -- Steven Wright


>-----Original Message-----
>From: PEN-L list [mailto:PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of andie
>nachgeborenen
>Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 6:04 AM
>To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [PEN-L] In defence of Krugman
>
>
>Actually, no. Roosevelt tried to pack the court, and
>failed. One of the former bad guy justices switched
>his view and started supporting the New Deal. The
>Roosevelt era court mainly supported expanded govt
>power to regulate business, not primarily enhanced
>free speech and civil rights. Its most notably free
>speech decision was probably US v. Dennis (1948),
>upholding the conviction of the CPUSA leaders for
>conspiracy to advocate the overthrow of the govt. The
>real civil libertarian court was the Warren Court,
>whose key members were Warren and Brennan, appointed
>by Eisenhower, and Goldberg, Fortas, and Marshall,
>appointed by Kennedy and Johnson. The one right thing
>you say here is that the Warren Court era is over. jks