PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: In defence of Krugman and against Alexander Cockburn: choice oftargets
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: In defence of Krugman and against Alexander Cockburn: choice oftargets
- From: paul phillips <phillipsp@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 23:29:21 -0600
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02
Yea , I smoked a pipe for many yeares and enjoyed it -- until I became a
victim of ashma and quit smoking. Now I find smoke of any sort a
terrible hazard. More so for my wife for whom smoke of any sort
triggers heart fibrilations that are potentially fatal. I think the
tobacco companies deserve legal defence just as homocial murderers. No
more, no less.
But on the more important question of Krugman versus Stiglitz. To me
there is no contest. Though I appreciate and forward Krugman's odd
commentary, I tend to agree with his criticism is just neoclassic
orthodoxy in critique of neoliberal ideology. It is just nice to see
the mainstream agree will the few of us that critique the economic
world from the real left.
On the other hand, I think Stiglitz is a different 'kettle of fish'.
First, as others have observed, he is not in the same game of personal
aggrandizement. Second, along with his fellow nobel award winner
(Akerlof) his economics is not orthodox and accepts both institutional
frameworks and non-neoclassical frameworks -- e.g. assymetrical
information, etc. -- . The beauty of Stiglitz's critique is that it
allowed us to deveolop a non-orthodox analysis that we could present,
not only to our students, but also to the general public. Without
ideological baggage.
In Solidarity,
Paul Phillips.
Louis Proyect wrote:
Carl, I smoked a pipe for several decades before quitting -- and I would
be afraid to add up how many thousands of dollars (not covered by
insurance) I have spent on repairing (partly) the damage it did to my
teeth. Right now, I've got a large gap in the front of my mouth (upper)
which has cost me so far %3000 (for the implants) and will cost another
thousand or two for the crowns on the implants. And it will cost me
about $5000 to get the teeth below filled in. Trying to add it up in my
head right now, I must have clsoe to $20,000 dental work in my mouth,
counting only repair of the damage done by holding a pipe between my
teeth.
Carrol
Mark Jones was a pipe smoker.
Louis Proyect, Marxism mailing list: http://www.marxmail.org
- Thread context:
- Re: In defence of Krugman and against Alexander Cockburn: choice of targets, (continued)
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]