From: andie nachgeborenen <andie_nachgeborenen@xxxxxxxxx>
I make my living in part defending tobacco companies, and I make a lot of money too -- not as much as Dees, but I'm getting there, if I stay here, I will someday. I must be a real scumbag.
No, as a pipe smoker I must say you're serving a worthy cause. In fact, I think you should be serving in a pro bono capacity ;-)
Carl
_________________________________________________________________ Concerned that messages may bounce because your Hotmail account has exceeded its 2MB storage limit? Get Hotmail Extra Storage! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es
- Re: In defence of Krugman and against Alexander Cockburn: choice of targets, (continued)
- Re: In defence of Krugman and against Alexander Cockburn: choice of targets, Mike Ballard Sun 02 Nov 2003, 02:51 GMT
- Re: In defence of Krugman and against Alexander Cockburn: choice of targets, Carl Remick Fri 31 Oct 2003, 19:17 GMT
- Re: In defence of Krugman and against Alexander Cockburn: choice of targets, Devine, James Fri 31 Oct 2003, 21:07 GMT
- Re: In defence of Krugman and against Alexander Cockburn: choice of targets, Michael Perelman Fri 31 Oct 2003, 21:10 GMT
- Re: In defence of Krugman and against Alexander Cockburn: choice of targets, Carl Remick Sat 01 Nov 2003, 00:00 GMT
- Re: In defence of Krugman and against Alexander Cockburn: choice oftargets, Carrol Cox Sat 01 Nov 2003, 02:46 GMT
- Re: In defence of Krugman and against Alexander Cockburn: choice oftargets, Louis Proyect Sat 01 Nov 2003, 03:03 GMT
- Re: In defence of Krugman and against Alexander Cockburn: choice oftargets, paul phillips Sat 01 Nov 2003, 07:36 GMT
- Re: In defence of Krugman and against Alexander Cockburn: choice oftargets, Michael Perelman Sat 01 Nov 2003, 19:56 GMT