PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
US injuries in Iraq
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: US injuries in Iraq
- From: "Devine, James" <jdevine@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 08:23:03 -0800
- Thread-index: AcOcpoe20CcawgYBR8+P1aghhND4+Q==
- Thread-topic: US injuries in Iraq
someone asked about US injuries in Iraq. Here's what MS SLATE's
news summary reports today:
>USA Today's lead reminds that soldiers wounded in Iraq are
surviving at a higher rate than have Americans soldiers in other
recent wars, primarily because they have better body armor and
get quicker medical attention. The flip-side, says the paper, is
that the wounds tend to be more serious, since many of the
surviving soldiers would have died if they hadn't received such
quick care or hadn't had armor covering their vitals. According
to USAT's count, 1,609 soldiers have been wounded in Iraq--1,058
of them since May 1. <
------------------------
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- Thread context:
- Re: Michael's question: Iraq, (continued)
- Forwarded from the Green Party,
Louis Proyect Mon 27 Oct 2003, 19:04 GMT
- Mothers lose right to breastfeed children at work,
Alejandro Valle Baeza Mon 27 Oct 2003, 17:41 GMT
- US injuries in Iraq,
Devine, James Mon 27 Oct 2003, 16:22 GMT
- Altersuck,
Louis Proyect Mon 27 Oct 2003, 16:09 GMT
- China question,
Michael Perelman Mon 27 Oct 2003, 04:53 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]