PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Cancun
I am not familiar with the intricacies of ag. protectionism. I don't know
how much the Korean government supports agriculture, but without state
support much of California could not compete in agriculture. California
has massive water subsidies, which are much more important than the better
known subsidies. The major subsidy is cheap immigrants, who work in the
fields when it gets above 110 degrees. Using the Korean analogy, many of
the Mexican workers would be better suited to doing ag. work in Mexico.
But there, the state diverts the irrigation to the big farmers and leaves
the small farmers without support.
Maybe David Barkin or someone more familiar with Mexico could comment.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread context:
- Re: Peter Fisher, (continued)
- REMINDER: Capital course in NYC, from 10/13,
Drewk Sat 11 Oct 2003, 23:25 GMT
- Cancun,
Doug Henwood Sat 11 Oct 2003, 19:09 GMT
- Re: Cancun,
Louis Proyect Sat 11 Oct 2003, 19:47 GMT
- Re: Cancun,
Michael Perelman Sun 12 Oct 2003, 00:30 GMT
- The class struggles in Holland: I'll do anything for love, but I won't do that,
Jurriaan Bendien Sat 11 Oct 2003, 09:03 GMT
- free trade in animals,
Eubulides Sat 11 Oct 2003, 03:52 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]