Michael Hoover wrote:
tone doesn't always travel well in this medium, my comment was directed at use of 'stalinist' in relation to concept of 'quantity into quality', while some marxism (various elements to various degrees) became ossified, i don't understand purpose/function of reference to 'stalinist' in above sentence (does it make concept a canard or was person using term as toss-off remark)...
It was Slavoj Zizek being playful, poking fun at the categorizers who call him a "Stalinist" for admiring Lenin, for finding the Soviet experience not totally worthless, etc. They call him a Eurocentrist too.
Doug
- Re: Christopher Hitchens: why not invade Iran?, (continued)
- Re: Christopher Hitchens: why not invade Iran?, Jurriaan Bendien Mon 06 Oct 2003, 19:05 GMT
- Re: Bush - dolt or ordinary criminal?, Michael Hoover Mon 06 Oct 2003, 17:46 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Bush - dolt or ordinary criminal?, Devine, James Mon 06 Oct 2003, 17:57 GMT
- Re: Bush - dolt or ordinary criminal?, Michael Hoover Tue 07 Oct 2003, 21:04 GMT
- Re: Bush - dolt or ordinary criminal?, Doug Henwood Tue 07 Oct 2003, 21:13 GMT
- Re: Bush - dolt or ordinary criminal?, Devine, James Tue 07 Oct 2003, 21:15 GMT
- Re: Bush - dolt or ordinary criminal?, Doug Henwood Wed 08 Oct 2003, 01:42 GMT
- Triumph of the Wimp (flash movie), Michael Hoover Mon 06 Oct 2003, 13:28 GMT
- A tour of southern Iraq, Michael Pollak Mon 06 Oct 2003, 12:09 GMT