PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: The oil and gas situation, according to the expurts
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: The oil and gas situation, according to the expurts
- From: "Devine, James" <jdevine@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 08:40:22 -0700
- Thread-index: AcOJvKsBoir6nU7FSjSIYLj7XQnsLgAB13bg
- Thread-topic: [PEN-L] The oil and gas situation, according to the expurts
> Jurriaan Bendien wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone ever done a really comprehensive
> > quantitative world study of the
> > political economy of cars ?
>
> "Automobilization," if I remember correctly, was a central concern of
> Baran & Sweezy's _Monopoly Capitalism_. They offer that as the core
> explanation for both the boom of the '20s and of the '50s.
>
> Carrol
>
> (This is strictly from memory of a book I last looked at over 25 years
> ago.)
Carrol, your memory is correct. B&S posited a persistent tendency for the US economy to
fall into Depression-like stagnation, ever since the rise of "Monopoly Capital" in the 1900s.
One reason why there were short-lived periods of (limited) prosperity, in their books, was
unexplained waves of innovation with accompanying infrastructural investment, centered on
automobilization. (BTW, I don't find this very satisfying.)
Jim D.
- Thread context:
- Re: The oil and gas situation, according to the expurts, (continued)
- Re: The oil and gas situation, according to the expurts,
David B. Shemano Fri 03 Oct 2003, 06:45 GMT
- Re: The oil and gas situation, according to the expurts,
Sabri Oncu Fri 03 Oct 2003, 07:30 GMT
- Re: The oil and gas situation, according to the expurts,
Devine, James Fri 03 Oct 2003, 15:39 GMT
- Re: The oil and gas situation, according to the expurts,
Carl Remick Fri 03 Oct 2003, 16:08 GMT
- Bush failing?,
Michael Perelman Thu 02 Oct 2003, 05:08 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]