PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Rush Limbaugh
On Thursday, October 2, 2003 at 16:13:28 (-0400) Doug Henwood writes:
>...
>Oh come on. What's wrong with a little ad hominem, especially with
>such a gang of thugs? Here's a guy with every advantage in life
>handed to him - Andover, Yale, Harvard, inherited money and position
>- and he's still a provincial ignoramus. Marx never had any problem
>with making fun of his enemies.
My difficulty with ad hominem is that it is something I can't share in
conversations with others who do not share my viewpoint about the
behavior of these thugs; and usually the ad hominem is led with, not
used as the concluding exclamation point on a set of well-reasoned
attacks on someone's behavior.
Besides, I'm a provincial ignoramus on any number of fronts myself.
Bill
- Thread context:
- Re: Rush Limbaugh, (continued)
- Re: Rush Limbaugh,
Carl Remick Thu 02 Oct 2003, 16:49 GMT
- Re: Rush Limbaugh,
Devine, James Thu 02 Oct 2003, 20:05 GMT
- Rush Limbaugh,
Devine, James Thu 02 Oct 2003, 20:10 GMT
- Re: Rush Limbaugh,
Devine, James Thu 02 Oct 2003, 20:30 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]