Devine, James wrote:
Carrol writes:I've several times on different lists raised an eyebrow as it were re the focus on GWB's intelligence. I still remember vividly how fooled everyone was in Eisenhower's administration by his genius at mimicking stupidity. I think leftists should simply stay away from estimating _anyone's_ intelligence or absence thereof. Remember Gould's _Mismeasure of Man_ -- and particularly his savaging of the concept of _g_. Focus on what a government _does_ and on the actual content (not the style) of what it says, not on the personel.
In addition, it's not the "intelligence" of W that's importance.
Oh come on. What's wrong with a little ad hominem, especially with such a gang of thugs? Here's a guy with every advantage in life handed to him - Andover, Yale, Harvard, inherited money and position - and he's still a provincial ignoramus. Marx never had any problem with making fun of his enemies.
Doug
- Rush Limbaugh, Louis Proyect Thu 02 Oct 2003, 15:34 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Rush Limbaugh, Carl Remick Thu 02 Oct 2003, 16:49 GMT
- Re: Rush Limbaugh, Carrol Cox Thu 02 Oct 2003, 19:13 GMT
- Re: Rush Limbaugh, Devine, James Thu 02 Oct 2003, 20:05 GMT
- Re: Rush Limbaugh, Doug Henwood Thu 02 Oct 2003, 20:13 GMT
- Re: Rush Limbaugh, Bill Lear Thu 02 Oct 2003, 20:26 GMT
- Re: Rush Limbaugh, Carrol Cox Thu 02 Oct 2003, 21:11 GMT
- Rush Limbaugh, Devine, James Thu 02 Oct 2003, 20:10 GMT
- Re: Rush Limbaugh, Devine, James Thu 02 Oct 2003, 20:30 GMT