PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: futures market military intelligence
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: futures market military intelligence
- From: "Devine, James" <jdevine@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 14:03:48 -0700
- Thread-index: AcNVkFaGMMebgsHwQeaELUK0d6HxXQAhD5+g
- Thread-topic: [PEN-L] futures market military intelligence
a discussion on US National Public Radio I heard today indicates one reason why this program won't fly: terrorists can use the market to bet that a terrorist attack will occur and then win big by making it happen.
------------------------
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Perelman [mailto:michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:15 PM
> To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [PEN-L] futures market military intelligence
>
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/29/politics/29TERR.html
> Both Pacifica News and the New York Times have stories about using the
> futures market to predict terrorist activities. I find the story
> fascinating in one respect. Futures markets should predict future
> activities given certain assumptions, including that the
> participants have
> adequate access to information.
>
> If the futures market participants have good enough information, then
> United States could just dismantle its intelligence agencies
> and rely on
> the futures market. It also suggests that the typical
> American -- or at
> least herds of typical Americans -- have information
> virtually equivalent
> to the government. Quite an admission on the part of the Pentagon.
>
> --
> Michael Perelman Economics Department
> California State University
> Chico, CA 95929
>
> Tel. 530-898-5321
> E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]