Re: Of Coase/Hayek Not?

To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Of Coase/Hayek Not?
From: andie nachgeborenen <andie_nachgeborenen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 19:22:51 -0700

>
> The firm needs a coordinator, but Coase fails to
> explain why (s)he isn't hired by the workers.
>
> mbs

Same problem with Hayek's argument for markets. This
leads you on the path of market socialism, my own
view. I used to drive libertarians crazy with this
one. Probably still could if the occasion presented
itself.

jks

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

References:
- Of Coase
  - From: Max B. Sawicky

Prev by Date: Re: Question on real net new invesment in the US
Next by Date: The Not-So-Hidden Election
Previous by thread: Re: Of Coase
Next by thread: Re: Of Coase
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: No Googling quiz, (continued)
- The Not-So-Hidden Election, Michael Hoover Fri 18 Jul 2003, 02:41 GMT
- Of Coase, Max B. Sawicky Fri 18 Jul 2003, 01:10 GMT
  - Re: Of Coase, Eubulides Fri 18 Jul 2003, 01:20 GMT
  - Re: Of Coase/Hayek Not?, andie nachgeborenen Fri 18 Jul 2003, 02:23 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: Of Coase, David S. Shemano Fri 18 Jul 2003, 06:32 GMT
    - Re: Of Coase, Jurriaan Bendien Fri 18 Jul 2003, 06:58 GMT
    - Re: Of Coase, Max B. Sawicky Fri 18 Jul 2003, 13:54 GMT
    - Re: Of Coase, andie nachgeborenen Fri 18 Jul 2003, 16:10 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]