Re: Back to slavery

To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Back to slavery
From: "David S. Shemano" <dshemano@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 10:50:31 -0700

Justin writes:

>> This isn't to say that the incentive Michael talks
>> about doesn't exist. Btw, David, are you a  litigator
>> or a transactional lawyer?

I am corporate bankruptcy attorney, which is primarily transactional but involves litigation in that Bankruptcy Court approval is required for various transactions, and various constituencies attempt to protect rights.

David Shemano

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Back to slavery
  - From: Kenneth Campbell

Prev by Date: Re: Back to slavery
Next by Date: Re: Back to slavery
Previous by thread: Bankruptcy
Next by thread: Re: Back to slavery
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: Back to slavery, (continued)
  - Re: Back to slavery, Devine, James Wed 16 Jul 2003, 17:04 GMT
    - Re: Back to slavery, Michael Perelman Wed 16 Jul 2003, 18:17 GMT
  - Re: Back to slavery, David S. Shemano Wed 16 Jul 2003, 17:46 GMT
    - Bankruptcy, Michael Perelman Wed 16 Jul 2003, 18:24 GMT
  - Re: Back to slavery, David S. Shemano Wed 16 Jul 2003, 17:50 GMT
    - Re: Back to slavery, Kenneth Campbell Wed 16 Jul 2003, 18:02 GMT
  - Re: Back to slavery, Devine, James Wed 16 Jul 2003, 18:20 GMT
    - Re: Back to slavery, Eric Nilsson Wed 16 Jul 2003, 18:31 GMT
      
      Re: Back to slavery, Michael Perelman Wed 16 Jul 2003, 19:30 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]