PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Back to slavery
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Back to slavery
- From: "Devine, James" <jdevine@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 10:03:59 -0700
- Thread-index: AcNLu9lMNweBjT3iQHq6y+vECmES2QAACHjA
- Thread-topic: [PEN-L] Back to slavery
Ken writes:
However, lawyers are just more sensitive to the criticism since they are
on TV more. Perry Mason never did have a kindred soul from economics on
TV. "Your honor, I contend the witness inflated the GDP numbers to cover
up the failure of the auto industry and the increase in transaction
costs off shore!" <Gasp from court room>
I'm going to have nightmares about a TV show "John Pareto, Economist." Of course, people would start complaining that there aren't enough ads to break up the tedium...
------------------------
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- Thread context:
- Re: Back to slavery, (continued)
- Re: Back to slavery,
Devine, James Wed 16 Jul 2003, 16:50 GMT
- Re: Back to slavery,
Devine, James Wed 16 Jul 2003, 17:04 GMT
- Re: Back to slavery,
David S. Shemano Wed 16 Jul 2003, 17:46 GMT
- Bankruptcy,
Michael Perelman Wed 16 Jul 2003, 18:24 GMT
- Re: Back to slavery,
David S. Shemano Wed 16 Jul 2003, 17:50 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]