Re: Back to slavery

To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Back to slavery
From: "David S. Shemano" <dshemano@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 09:44:32 -0700

Michael Perelman writes:

>> Do lawyers really limit transactions costs. I thought that they maximized
>> billable hours.

If we didn't add value, why would we be hired?

David Shemano

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Back to slavery
  - From: andie nachgeborenen
- Re: Back to slavery
  - From: Kenneth Campbell

Prev by Date: Re: the next frontier of 'privatization'
Next by Date: Re: Back to slavery
Previous by thread: Transaction Costs (Re: Back to slavery)
Next by thread: Re: Back to slavery
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: Back to slavery, (continued)
  - Re: Back to slavery, Devine, James Wed 16 Jul 2003, 04:01 GMT
    - Transaction Costs (Re: Back to slavery), andie nachgeborenen Wed 16 Jul 2003, 14:56 GMT
  - Re: Back to slavery, David S. Shemano Wed 16 Jul 2003, 16:44 GMT
    - Re: Back to slavery, Kenneth Campbell Wed 16 Jul 2003, 16:48 GMT
    - Re: Back to slavery, andie nachgeborenen Wed 16 Jul 2003, 16:53 GMT
  - Re: Back to slavery, Devine, James Wed 16 Jul 2003, 16:50 GMT
    - Re: Back to slavery, andie nachgeborenen Wed 16 Jul 2003, 16:56 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]