PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Back to slavery
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Phillips" <phillp2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> But a more fundamental issue relates to the Coase theorum itself -
> - that "if there are NO Transaction Costs, the distribution of
> property rights does not matter for the efficiency (pareto optimality)
> of the market solution." However, if there ARE transaction costs,
> then the distribution of property rights becomes very important to
> the efficiency of the result. This is quite easy to demonstrate with
> realistic examples. What this does raise the vital question of the
> distribution of property rights to the efficiency of the non-regulated
> market, something that is not dealt with by nc economics and is
> avoided like the plague by those economists who reject
> government intervention in markets precisely to make them efficient.
>
> Paul Phillips
=====================
To create-allocate-distribute property rights is to constitute-regulate
markets. Non-regulated markets are an oxymoron.
Efficiency is polysemous.
Ian
- Thread context:
- Re: Back to slavery, (continued)
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]