Re: Back to slavery

To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Back to slavery
From: Eubulides <paraconsistent@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 20:27:28 -0700

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kenneth Campbell" <kkc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>



> Michael wrote:
>
> >Do lawyers really limit transactions costs. I thought that
> >they maximized billable hours.
>
> They _do_ limit transaction costs... if you count resultant contractual
> law suits as part of transaction costs.
>
> It's a kind of mafia protection racket... "Let me vet your contract, so
> that I don't help the other party sue you after the fact."
>
> But that's just one way of looking at it...
>
> Ken.


======================

Uh oh............:-)

Ian

References:
- Re: Back to slavery
  - From: Kenneth Campbell

Prev by Date: Re: Back to slavery
Next by Date: quick question
Previous by thread: Re: Back to slavery
Next by thread: Re: Back to slavery
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: Back to slavery, (continued)
  - Re: Back to slavery, David S. Shemano Wed 16 Jul 2003, 02:20 GMT
    - Re: Back to slavery, Michael Perelman Wed 16 Jul 2003, 02:57 GMT
      
      Re: Back to slavery, Kenneth Campbell Wed 16 Jul 2003, 03:03 GMT
      
      Re: Back to slavery, Eubulides Wed 16 Jul 2003, 03:27 GMT
    - Re: Back to slavery, Paul Phillips Wed 16 Jul 2003, 04:51 GMT
      
      Re: Back to slavery, Eubulides Wed 16 Jul 2003, 05:03 GMT
  - Re: Back to slavery, Devine, James Wed 16 Jul 2003, 04:01 GMT
    - Transaction Costs (Re: Back to slavery), andie nachgeborenen Wed 16 Jul 2003, 14:56 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]