PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: DU
Absolutely.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 10:03:58AM -0700, Devine, James wrote:
> is DU more radioactive than the lead used in "normal" bullets, which also form little particles?
>
> ------------------------
> Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
>
> [was: RE: [PEN-L] Death By Slow Burn: How America Nukes Its Own Troops}
>
> Michael wrote:
> > Yes and no. A piece of depleted uranium is not particularly
> > radioactive
> > because the particles it emits are relatively big and will
> > mostly bounce
> > off your skin. When it is fired, it forms tiny particles that you can
> > breathe into your body. These particles continually give off
> > radioactivity inside your lungs, where they do great harm.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Prev by Date:
DU
- Next by Date:
Re: DU
- Previous by thread:
DU
- Next by thread:
Re: DU
- Index(es):
- Thread context:
- Michael Hudson replies,
Louis Proyect Tue 15 Jul 2003, 01:33 GMT
- Michael Hudson Interview questions,
michael Mon 14 Jul 2003, 23:00 GMT
- A new initiative in bloggology,
Jurriaan Bendien Mon 14 Jul 2003, 21:52 GMT
- DU,
Devine, James Mon 14 Jul 2003, 17:04 GMT
- Re: DU,
Michael Perelman Mon 14 Jul 2003, 17:08 GMT
- Re: DU,
Alejandro Valle Baeza Mon 14 Jul 2003, 17:17 GMT
- Re: DU,
Mark Rickling Tue 15 Jul 2003, 01:57 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- DU,
Les Schaffer Tue 15 Jul 2003, 17:17 GMT
- Re: DU,
Michael Pollak Tue 15 Jul 2003, 23:32 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]