PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
DU
- To: PEN-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: DU
- From: "Devine, James" <jdevine@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:03:58 -0700
- Thread-index: AcNKJyeamJORa+95SOitRXWtFJFKOQAApf1g
- Thread-topic: [PEN-L] Death By Slow Burn: How America Nukes Its Own Troops
is DU more radioactive than the lead used in "normal" bullets, which also form little particles?
------------------------
Jim Devine jdevine@xxxxxxx & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
[was: RE: [PEN-L] Death By Slow Burn: How America Nukes Its Own Troops}
Michael wrote:
> Yes and no. A piece of depleted uranium is not particularly
> radioactive
> because the particles it emits are relatively big and will
> mostly bounce
> off your skin. When it is fired, it forms tiny particles that you can
> breathe into your body. These particles continually give off
> radioactivity inside your lungs, where they do great harm.
- Thread context:
- more trade doom,
Eubulides Tue 15 Jul 2003, 02:04 GMT
- Michael Hudson replies,
Louis Proyect Tue 15 Jul 2003, 01:33 GMT
- Michael Hudson Interview questions,
michael Mon 14 Jul 2003, 23:00 GMT
- A new initiative in bloggology,
Jurriaan Bendien Mon 14 Jul 2003, 21:52 GMT
- DU,
Devine, James Mon 14 Jul 2003, 17:04 GMT
- Re: DU,
Michael Perelman Mon 14 Jul 2003, 17:08 GMT
- Re: DU,
Alejandro Valle Baeza Mon 14 Jul 2003, 17:17 GMT
- Re: DU,
Mark Rickling Tue 15 Jul 2003, 01:57 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- DU,
Les Schaffer Tue 15 Jul 2003, 17:17 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]