Patrick Bond wrote:
But sure, it's very hard to do autarchy. That's why advocates of delinking like Amin and Bello specify that they are not for 100% autarchy. They promote delinking from the most destructive circuitry of capital, namely pure export-led growth based upon primary commodities, and debt repayment. Join 'em, Doug?
On that, yes, completely. But I'm still not clear on what you're advocating as an alternative. 100% autarchy is impossible. But 50%? 25%? You could never have any delinking if there weren't substantial solidarity among poorer countries - some kind of trading, financial, and technological links. As soon as I say that though, I wonder - what common interests are there between Brazil and Zimbabwe?
Doug
- Re: Monbiot on the WTO, (continued)
- Re: Monbiot on the WTO, Peter Dorman Wed 25 Jun 2003, 00:47 GMT
- Re: Monbiot on the WTO, Patrick Bond Wed 25 Jun 2003, 06:48 GMT
- Re: Monbiot on the WTO, Doug Henwood Wed 25 Jun 2003, 13:38 GMT
- Re: Monbiot on the WTO, Patrick Bond Wed 25 Jun 2003, 19:54 GMT
- Re: Monbiot on the WTO, Doug Henwood Wed 25 Jun 2003, 23:39 GMT
- Re: Monbiot on the WTO, Patrick Bond Thu 26 Jun 2003, 08:44 GMT
- Re: Monbiot on the WTO, Doug Henwood Wed 25 Jun 2003, 16:32 GMT
- Re: Monbiot on the WTO, Peter Dorman Wed 25 Jun 2003, 17:49 GMT
- Re: Monbiot on the WTO, Sabri Oncu Tue 24 Jun 2003, 04:45 GMT