PEN-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: the Fed
Why 2 branches in Missouri?
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:42:12PM -0400, Doug Henwood wrote:
> Michael Hoover wrote:
>
> >if answer to question about number of banks is no, when did it become
> >12...how many have there been in times past...
>
> Others have answered that it's always been 12 in the same place. My
> contribution is this: no place in the U.S. was supposed to be more
> than a day's train ride from a branch at the time of founding.
>
> Doug
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread context:
- Re: the Fed, (continued)
- Re: the Fed,
Devine, James Tue 24 Jun 2003, 21:41 GMT
- Re: the Fed,
Michael Hoover Tue 24 Jun 2003, 22:05 GMT
- Re: the Fed,
Michael Perelman Tue 24 Jun 2003, 22:13 GMT
- Re: the Fed,
Doug Henwood Tue 24 Jun 2003, 23:42 GMT
- Re: the Fed,
Michael Perelman Wed 25 Jun 2003, 03:05 GMT
- Re: the Fed,
Devine, James Tue 24 Jun 2003, 22:16 GMT
- trial of Long Term Credit Mgmt.,
Michael Perelman Tue 24 Jun 2003, 20:45 GMT
- middle east news,
Devine, James Tue 24 Jun 2003, 19:01 GMT
- Par for the course,
Louis Proyect Tue 24 Jun 2003, 18:02 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]