Re: Freud & Assessing Un-Blinded Experimentation

[ravi <gadfly@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Murray wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hari Kumar" <hari.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>>By the way:
>>Is Ian is still reading - thx for your reply! But the poor benighted
>>ML-ist [Hereafter PBML-ist] did not get what it/she/he wanted. So - yes
>>that quotation was certainly expressive of Popper. What i was driving at
>>- was that you you were saying that there was a lot of literature
>>'attacking' [paraphrase of PBML-ist] Popper. ti sounded as you were
>>talking that this emanated from "respectable" Philosophical sources.
>>Please cite!
>>Cheers, H
>
> KP's output was pretty huge so he had plenty of detractors as well as
> friends; the below are some of what I have that dealt with the debates:
>
> <cites deleted>
>
> That'll keep you busy and dizzy; obviously there more dead trees filled
> with stuff..........
>

even after jks and i threw in the statutory pkf reference, how can you
forget to mention the popper fan turned critic (what is it he called
popper? a little puff in the positivist teacup?) ;-) - i am sure there
is something in feyerabend's books and rants that is a thorough critic
and attendant ridicule of sir karl!

and dare i mention soros ;-) ;-) ;-).

        --ravi